THE GOSPEL
ACCORDING TO MATTHEW
There
are two things you will learn in this Forum: that one of
the Wise Men was a Lutheran
and that God intended for the Church to be Episcopalian.
But first, the less relevant stuff.
To
begin, here is a thumbnail comparison of the four gospels:
- Mark - Jesus is a man of
action (the key word is euthus, (immediately), as Jesus goes from
place to place as he teaches and performs miracles.
place to place as he teaches and performs miracles.
- Luke - Jesus in the healer,
compasssion one.
- John - the gospel is focused on our
relationship to the Risen Christ.
- Matthew - Jesus as rabbi, teacher.
In
constructing his gospel, Matthew bases most of his narrative on the earlier
gospel of Mark and, like Luke, gets most of Jesus' teaching from a document
scholars have named "Q," from the Latin, "Quella," which
means "document" or "source." Matthew uses a slightly
different and longer version of Q than Luke does. He also uses different
sources all his own as well as one of the widely circulated versions of the
Passion. His gospel was written about 95 CE, well after the death of the
disciple Matthew.
In
Matthew, teaching
is paramount - Matthew
gathers
scattered remarks in
the other gospels into extended narratives. For example, he takes a few
verses in Luke and transforms them into the Sermon on the Mount.
I will focus on the two main issues or concerns
that run through Matthew's gospel:
Christian ethics or morality, including his concern for church
life.
Our relationship to Israel or the Jews
and the Jewish Law.
MORAL/ETHICAL
GUIDANCE:
Several years ago I was very
involved in our national church's debate on sexual morality. Our General
Convention had set up a list serve so all our bishops, General Convention
deputies, and members of national committees could work through important
issues between Conventions. I was one of ten liberals given the imposing title
of "Verbosian." Ten conservatives were given the same title, which
represented our leadership on different sides of several issues.
The debates about sexual morality
mirrored the much earlier debate in American Christianity about slavery. The
pro-slavery faction's arguments were based on proof-texting (assembling various
verses in the Bible, many out of context) while the anti-slavery faction argued
from the overall message of Scripture. My case was that Scripture, itself, and
the gospels in particular focused on matters of character and relationships in
dealing with sexual ethics. If you want to discover the heart of the teaching
in Christian Scriptures there are three places where you will find it: the
Beatitudes (Matthew 5:1-12 ff., The Last Judgment, "Lord, where did we see
you hungry. . .? (Matthew 25:31-46), and Paul's description of those led by the
Spirit in Galatians 5:22-23.
Matthew
gives extra weight to the Beatitudes and the rest of the Sermon on the Mount
which follows with his association of Jesus on the mountain with Moses
receiving the Law on Mt. Sinai. Later, near the center of the gospel, Matthew,
like Mark and Luke, has Jesus, in the Transfiguration on a hill, being flanked
by Moses (Law) and Elijah, representing the Prophets.
PURPOSE
AND TEACHING
Mark
gathers what he has
as facts and arranges them for best effect
in communicating the meaning and effect of Jesus Christ. Matthew by and large
keeps Mark's arrangement, but deals with the facts/data in the
light of his beliefs
about the relationship of the Hebrew and Christian Scriptures and the needs of
the church.
- over and over he notes that certain events and
teaching were foretold
in Hebrew prophesy,
- almost every chapter contains the phrase "that
the Scripture may be fulfilled,"
- he sometimes modifies elements of a story to fit a prediction because of his belief that
Jesus has brought all prophesies to fulfillment,
- he sometimes modifies elements of a story to fit a prediction because of his belief that
Jesus has brought all prophesies to fulfillment,
- In the Sermon on the Mount, the phrase used is "it was said to those of
old time, but I say
. . ."
Matthew
often Tries
to relate teachings of Jesus to needs and circumstances of Church
Almsgiving / prayer and fasting (6:1-8)
Marriage and divorce - (5:27-32)
Conduct of children and brethren (18:10-14; 5:25-26; 7:12; 18:15f.)
Remaining faithful under persecution (latter half of the gospel)
The Parable of the Wicked Husbandmen
(Tenants) 21:33-44) shared by Luke and Mark, is used by Matthew to justify the
non-Jewish composition of the followers of Jesus.
STRUCTURE
OF THE GOSPEL
Matthew
mostly keeps
narrative and teaching separate, alternating Mark and his version of Q
Instead
of isolated sayings (Mark & Luke), Matthew has long discourses with single
theme.
1. Sermon on the Mount (5-7)
2. Duties of Missionaries (9:35-11:10)
3. Description of the character
required of followers of Jesus (13:1-58)
4. Strictures on Pharisees (18:1-19:1)
5. Apocalyptic teaching (24:1-26:2).
The
Overall Structure of the Gospel (reflecting the Five Books of the Torah)
The
Gospel begins with Geneology, Birth Narratives, Flight to Egypt (unique to Matthew)
The
Gospel ends with the Passion and Post-Resurrection Appearances.
The rest of
gospel is in
five sections, reflecting the five books of the Torah
1
Early ministry up to calling of disciples 7:28
2
Extension of Ministry in Galilee
11:1
3
Rising opposition (13:53)
4
Departure from Galilee- declaration of Messiahship
5
Journey to Jerusalem and arrival.
WHAT
ABOUT THE LAW?
First, for
Jews, the Law is a gift, not a burden (it
was a blessing to know what is required, what is expected
by one you love.
For
Matthew, Jesus
fulfills the Law (not
just follows, but brings to its full realization)
The best illustration of this is the ethical
progression from Lamech in Genesis (4:23-24) ""I have killed a man
for wounding me, a young man for striking me. If Cain's revenge is sevenfold,
then Lamech's is seventy-sevenfold.") to the revolutionary "an eye
for an eye, and a tooth for a tooth" in Exodus 21:24 to Jesus' words in
5:38-42) "You have heard that it has been said "an eye for an eye and
a tooth for a tooth," but I say unto you that you resist not evil, but
whosoever shall strike you on
your right cheek, turn to him the other cheek also."
I
believe the best treatment of the Sermon on the Mount is Dietrich Bonhoeffer's, The Cost of Discipleship. His treatment is compelling. One of Bonhoeffer's intimations
is that the point of much of the Sermon on the Mount is that in finding them
true,
but so difficult, we
are driven to God's Grace.
A Note
About the Relationship
of the Christian
Church to
the Jewish People (John,
also)
In John's Gospel, towards the end of the
Gospel there are several disparaging remarks about "the Jews." John's meaning is that there is a critical
difference between the Jews (and others) in the Jesus Movement and the Jews of
the Pharisees and like minded others. Each side argued that it was the
authentic remnant of the Jewish people who had preceded them. This struggle was not new in Judaism (or has
it been absent in the Christian churches!)
There have always been such struggles within Judaism, between the
traditions of the Law and the Prophets, later between the followers of Hillel
and
Shammai, and in our
time among Reformed, Conservative and Orthodox Jews.
With the Commentary on Paul's
Epistle to the Romans, the great Swiss theologian, Karl Barth, opened the door
for a whole new understanding of the relationship between Christians and Jews.
In summary, In Barth's study of Romans 11-12,
he notes Paul's argument that God's promise to Abraham that he and his
descendants would always be God's chosen people was a promise. Period. And God
does not break promises. Thus, the Jewish people remain God's chosen people -
and through the sacrificial death of Jesus, Christians have been grafted into
Jewish history. We now share in the promises ("the chosen people"
refers to our vocation to be "a light to the Gentiles" and to draw
all of creation to our Creator).
This discovery of Barth's is
revolutionary, though not as widely accepted throughout the Christian Church as
it should be. The predominant theology of the church through the ages has been
Triumphalism, by which once Jesus had come, he replaced the Law and those who
held onto the Law separate from Jesus were either of no account or the enemy.
That understanding has provided the roots for anti-Semitism through the
centuries. In our country, it was Paul van Buren, an Episcopalian, who first
popularized Barth's conclusions.
When you read Paul's argument in
Romans 11-12 in light of just what I just noted, Barth's conclusions seem
obvious; but one of the world's tragedies is that most of Christendom seems to
ignore or to be uninformed of them.
SO, HOW DO WE KNOW THAT GOD INTENDED THE CHURCH TO BE EPISCOPALIAN?
Through most of its life, the
Episcopal Church has embraced at least three theological and liturgical
traditions as part of its whole - High Church, Low Church, and Broad Church. All
that was precursed by Matthew, who was both narrowly Jewish and Universalist at
the same time. Matthew stood with both Jewish and Gentile Christianity. thus
for Matthew:
The Law is valid forever 5:17,18
Jesus' mission was limited
to lost sheep of house of Israel (15:24)
While scribes & Pharisees
must not be imitated, obey what they teach (23:3)
Also:
Jesus' sayings and actions proclaim
a
message which is
universal
The disciples are to
show love for all without distinction, mirroring Fr. in heaven (5:43)
When the Kingdom
co0mes, many will be
gathered
from East and West (8:11,12)
Matthew quotes prophesy
that
"in his Name will Gentiles trust" (12:21)
Parable of Wicked Husbandmen describes ascendancy of Gentile
church (21:33-43)
In the Parable of the Last
Judgment - all nations shall be gathered.
A WALK
THROUGH THE GOSPEL
Matthew's Geneology (1:1ff.) the Greek word is "The Genesis"
. . .much as John begins his Gospel,
"in the beginning".
Unique
in Matthew's Gospel, five women
mentioned (four with odd sexual history)
Zerah by Tamar
Salmon, father of Boaz
by Rahab (the prostitute)
Ruth and Boaz
Solomon, by the wife of
Uriah (Bathsheba)
Jacob, father of Joseph,
husband of Mary.
Note: a friend of mine, Doug Adams,
wrote a book, "The Prostitute in the Family Tree."
In
Mt.1:23 Matthew quotes Isaiah, "a
virgin shall conceive." Isaiah's "virgin" meant "(young
woman" with no connotation of sexual history. The phrase in our creeds
about the Virgin Mary was inserted as testimony to th humanness of Jesus' birth
- against various heresies.
The Wise
Men (from Micah) were not three, but a group of some size). In our popular
depiction of the three wise men, note that they represent the known world, as
one is Semitic, one Asian, and one Caucasian. What is not widely known is that
scholars, in studying the Dead Sea Scrolls, have determined that myhrr means
"meatball casserole," thus indicating that at least one of the wise
men was Lutheran.
The
Flight into Egypt - unique to Matthew. Remember, Jesus is the best known refugee in human
history - Moses is second. That
experience is reflected in much of Jesus's reflections on his own life:
"Foxes have holes and birds have their nests, but the Son of man has no
place to lay his head," and in the Prologue to John's Gospel, "he
came to his own and his own received him
not."
Slaughter
of Innocents (from Jeremiah) as is Jesus' association with Nazareth.
Baptism
- using words of Isaiah.
Sermon
on Mount - Note the power of Jesus' words to the crowds (and us), "You are
the light of the world," no "You ought to be," or you better
be." A simple and most powerful "You are. . "
My
favorite story in the Gospels: Matthew
8:20ff. Jesus heals the demoniac in the
Gerascenes and sends the evil spirits into the onlookers flocks/herds which
then throw themselves to their death over a cliff. Jesus is either asked to
leave - or leaves by losing himself in the crowd and then skeedaddling. Luke's
version of the story is relatively benign. Matthew has fewer details than in
Mark. (my favorite performance piece is based on this story)
Call of disciples 9:9 followed by charge in following chapter. What is especially striking in these and other stories of the calling of Jesus' disciples is that in leaving everything at once, there must have been something extraordinarily compelling in Jesus' appearance or invitation. This, for me, is also the point of many of the healings and miracles - they point to something incredibly compelling in the person of Jesus;.
First
Parable - Chapter 13
Workers
in the Vineyard - often overlooked, it is one of the most powerful in dealing
with radical inclusion, e.g. the steward keeps coming back to hire those
available for work - strong men and boys first, then less strong and probably
older men, then the stronger women, then the marginalized, many of which
probably just woke up after a lifetime of drinking. . . .
Other parables only in Matthew (Pearl, Treasure, Wheat and Weeds, Unmerciful Servant)
The
Jesus Seminar scholars rate Matthew's Parable of the Workers in the Vineyard as
RED, one of the few that are reliably
Jesus' parables in Jesus' words. (worth another Forum)
Like
Mark's Gospel, at the midpoint of the Gospel, in Caesarea Philippi - Jesus asks
"Who do men say that I am. . ." everything changes, from Jesus'
teaching and forming his community to his path to his death on the Cross.
The
story of the children brought to him (19:13f.) is my favorite for teaching
Walter Wink's method of Bible study. Wink believes that most Bible study is
spiritually bankrupt, as it doesn't change anyone. Using this story I ask a
group to form themselves into several small groups: the children who don't know
what is going on, their parents who are intent on getting their children into
Jesus' presence for his blessing, the disciples who believe Jesus wants to be
protected from insignificant children, and Jesus.
Then the
action begins with parents and disciples struggling, the children doing
whatever they feel like doing in the midst of such anger and recriminations,
and Jesus finally shoving the disciples aside.
Then the questions: Who are the children in me - sometimes confused or
afraid - and sometimes knowing that we are safe and thoroughly loved? Who are
the parents in me, wanting so much for myself or my family but being
frustrated? Who are the disciples, living by what we thought were the rules,
but discovering that we were wrong all along? And who is the Jesus in me,
having to reach through all kinds of crap for what we know is right and true?
The
costs of Discipleship and the path to Jerusalem.
Signs of
the End, including the Last Judgment.
The Last
Supper & Betrayal (how the different gospel writers treat the betraying
kiss of Judas reveals one of the most powerful moments in history - more in a
future Forum)
The
Passion.followed by Matthew's version of the Post-Resurrection appearances by
Jesus.
The
final words of the Gospel, about going into the world, making disciples of all
nations, and baptizing them in the Name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy
Spirit are certainly thrilling; but it is clear that they were added later, as
any clear notion of the Trinity had yet to be formed.
Some
things from
Matthew's Gospel
that are unique to him.
The women in the geneology, also Matthew begins with
Abraham, Luke with Adam
Significant differences in Birth
Narratives from Luke (no birth narrative in Mark or John)
The Story of the Wise Men
The Flight to Egypt
The place of Jewish Law in our
lives.
Sermon on the Mount
Beatitudes, "Judge
Not . . .," etc..
Various parables not in Mark or Luke
Things
which may seem odd:
Matthew is not the first Gospel,
last of the Synoptics Date 95-105
End of Chapter 26 (end of Matthew)
tacked on many years later (Trinity)
Legendary character of several
stories
Dream of Pilate's wife
Pilate washing his hands
Earthquake & ghostly
apparitions at death of Jesus
Take
your time with Matthew's gospel. There are parts which will touch you deeply.
P.S. While you are here, you may want to check out my 15 Minute Play on Forgiveness (1/10/2012), the description of my opera which will be produced at The Cell Theatre in Albuquerque in mid-June (2/8/2011) and the aria of Bobbie Wentworth and the closing duet (both at 7/27/2012)